![]() |
|
|
To evaluate life cycles, FMs must consider the initial costs including capital and administrative expenses; facility operating costs such as operation (energy usage, operation costs), maintenance costs (cyclical replacements, credits, revenues), as well as loss of use or alternative use costs; and financing costs including the tax implications, discount/interest rates, escalation/inflation rates, financing options, the time value of money and salvage and residual values. Together, these will provide a close estimate of total LCC, by comparing competing products for the life expectancy of the project. One large residential and commercial lender used this formula and found that purchasing an energy efficient AC unit that initially cost more but qualified for rebates, actually cost less to operate, and lasted nearly 50 percent longer than less expensive models. In addition, recognizing that the cost of replacing carpet included labor, materials and loss of productivity, the firm opted for hard surfaces such as stone, granite and marble at building entrances and in high use areas to maximize the flooring life cycle. (See Figure 2). |
![]() Figure 2 - Hard, durable, long lasting surfaces that can be cleaned easily with water rather than abrasive cleansers increase LCC |
At first, this may seem to put FMs in a quandary, as it appears to contradict the goal of maximizing LCC. In reality, it’s one leg of the Value Triangle that includes quality, LCC, and time. When any leg of the triangle changes, it impacts the other two. If the goal is to renovate in the smallest amount of time possible, hence with the least disruption, the Value Triangle grows.
Good design adds value and improves the company’s image as well as productivity of its employees, yet it doesn’t always translate to added costs. A large financial institution wanted to extend the rich tones and textures that came from deep reddish-brown wood panels and reveals that lined the walls of the executive area. To achieve the same look and feel Environetics recreated the same detailing using less expensive gypsum board, resulting in image duplication without the high cost. (See Figures 3a and 3b).
![]() Figure 3a - Rich tones and textures from deep reddish-brown wood panels and reveals line the walls of the executive area. |
![]() Figure 3b - Outer areas created using less expensive gypsum board, provide a duplication of rich wood paneled executive offices without the high cost. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() Figure 5 - Outdoor seating with wireless connectivity allows employees to choose the environment best suited to fulfilling their job responsibilities, whether quiet, independent work or creative brainstorming. |
The universal plan focuses on space usage and not personal work styles. It may not mean an office for every employee. A good analogy is a typical high school. Most have a chemistry lab, a physics lab, a gym, classrooms, auditoriums and other areas that address specific functions. Individuals travel to and from spaces to ensure their educational (job) needs are met efficiently. In universal plans, functionality drives the design.
Universal plans deliver sustainable designs, rapid access to information, flexibility, increased productivity and collaboration, support for individual and group work and improved LCC. To ensure these plans maximize flexibility and meet the needs of every job function, FMs and their design teams must consult with HR, risk management, insurance, IT, and department heads. They must study different teams and individuals to determine how they work, what they need, and whom they interact with over time. In addition, they should talk to individuals at every level to identify the critical requirements for job success and factor in current and potential requirements for sustainability. Armed with this data, they can begin to create or renovate their workspaces.
Universal plans will aid FMs in designing workspaces that are virtually 100 percent adaptable. For example, an office environment may be comprised of:
Focusing on job functions in universal plans will also help FMs to “think outside the office.” Increasingly FMs have to meet the functional needs of those who work from remote locations. This requires an understanding of the individuals’ job functions, connectivity and security requirements. It demands that FMs work closely with other departments to ensure ergonomic and liability issues are resolved (i.e. setting specific work areas and hours). Through a universal plan, FMs can offer a menu of approved products that are acceptable to the company—from technology to furnishings—in terms of price, ergonomics and productivity. Companies then can opt to provide these items in whole, provide allowances, or require them to be used as guidelines as employees establish their workspaces.
As spaces become denser, environmental issues become a larger concern. For example, a company that housed 75 employees in 18,000 sf may house 120 in the same space using a universal plan. This results in new challenges from noise, health, temperature (more people + more power = more heat), and transportation. Universal plans must address:
One Fortune 1000 financial services firm is already breaking ground and defining best practices for implementing universal plans. The firm created an open desk environment with low walls where associates easily can identify co-workers they need to sit near and where all employees have equal access to windows and sunlight. The majority of workers are “mobile” with no assigned workspace. Those requiring a fixed location have a designated desk. Group areas including executive work rooms that facilitate collaboration, quiet zones with no telephones or talking, small conference rooms of all sizes and privacy levels, informal seating areas, and café environments, enable workers to focus on their jobs in the environment best suited to increasing productivity, collaboration, creativity and results.
Yes, times are a-changing and FMs are facing radical shifts in
how they do their jobs. Yet with the help of forward-thinking architects
and commercial interior designers with established specialties
in sustainability, workplace strategies and universal planning,
FMs will have the resources they need to create the office spaces
for the future.
Rodney Stone, C.I.D, is president of Environetics. Educated at Pratt Institute School of Architecture, Stone is a seasoned professional in the field of interior architecture and facilities management. Recent work includes projects for Fox Entertainment Group, Skyworks, Countrywide Capital Markets, United Online and Fremont General and its various divisions. Rodney has been a frequent lecturer on facilities planning and design, CAFM technology and the use of alternative office concepts as facility management tools. His professional registration, awards and organizations include Certified Interior Decorator (C.I.D.); International Facility Management Association (IFMA), past president; IFMA, San Fernando Valley chapter; IFMA's Computer Applications Council, past president; Global Corporate Real Estate Network, and CoreNet. He can be reached at rstone@environetics.net or at 310.287.2180.
Subodh A. Kumar, CFM, CFMJ, IFMA Fellow, is president of the Chartered Facility Management Group Inc. in Pasadena, Calif. and a consultant for Environetics. He has strategically optimized planning, design, construction, operations and maintenance for the public and private sectors, high-tech and biotechnology firms, utilities and transportation entities, research and academic environments. Educated at Cornell University, University of Michigan and UCLA, Subodh’s expertise includes facility management, business, construction engineering/ management and architecture. He frequently publishes and presents in international journals and conferences globally. He can be reached by e-mail: cfmgroupsk@earthlink.net